Welcome Guest

RE: So while the headline and the beginning of the article say

Posted on: February 11, 2019 at 23:03:19 CT
None**** MU
Posts:
3326
Member For:
1.40 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Yes, the premise of the article is false. The Obama era WOTUS rules inserted changes in definitions that the actual legislation did not authorize. Rules are not supposed to exceed the regulation and this rollback reestablished rules within the law.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

I don't understand those who support this - raskolnikov MU - 2/11 21:45:38
     RE: I don't understand those who support this - meatiger MU - 2/12 07:54:11
     These are minor runoff ditches. - Coors4bob MU - 2/12 07:06:42
     Can the states or people sue those who pollute the - JeffB MU - 2/11 23:09:09
          RE: Can the states or people sue those who pollute the - None**** MU - 2/11 23:11:47
     gvmt can do no good - pickle MU - 2/11 22:31:11
          RE: So it's returning to how it was prior to the Obama admin? - None**** MU - 2/11 22:46:45
               Under the Obama rule, a corn seed in a corn field - meatiger MU - 2/12 08:00:34
               RE: So it's returning to how it was prior to the Obama admin? - None**** MU - 2/11 22:50:31
          This is like rask's post this morning - Sal KC - 2/11 22:22:16
     The Clean Water Act has been an utter failure. - TigerMatt STL - 2/11 22:20:19
     Yes, big corporations just can't wait - Sal KC - 2/11 22:05:00
          RE: So while the headline and the beginning of the article say - None**** MU - 2/11 23:03:19
     Why didnt Dems pass a law? - Spanky KU - 2/11 22:01:57




©2019 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard